Because every sprint deserves more than "Sprint 42."
Numbered sprints (Sprint 42, Sprint 43) work, but they don't stick. A named sprint gives the team a shared shorthand for the two weeks of work: retros callbacks land better ("remember Sprint Kraken?"), stand-ups feel less procedural, and stakeholders remember what shipped in which cycle. Scrum, formalized by Ken Schwaber and Jeff Sutherland in the mid-1990s and codified in the Scrum Guide, doesn't require sprint names — but naming is a common informal ritual on high-momentum agile teams.
Twenty-plus names to seed your next quarter. Rotate through a theme and your team gets the memory hook without the naming debate every two weeks.
A good sprint name is short (one or two words), memorable, thematically consistent with the surrounding sprints, and doesn't tie itself to a specific goal that might shift. "Nebula" is a good sprint name. "Q3 Billing Push Sprint 4 Final" is not.
Named sprints are not required by the Scrum Guide, and Sprint 42 works fine for tracking purposes. But teams that name sprints report better retrospective recall and more informal cohesion — the name becomes a shared handle for "the two weeks we did X." If your team is remote-heavy or async-heavy, the memory hook helps more.
Yes, and this is the highest-leverage version of sprint naming. Pick a category (space, mythology, animals, coffee drinks, cocktails) for a quarter or half. Each sprint gets the next name in that category. New teammates learn the theme immediately and the sequence becomes a lightweight team ritual.
Once per quarter is the common cadence — long enough for the theme to feel established, short enough to avoid running out of names in a category. Some teams tie the theme change to a company milestone (post-launch, post-offsite) so the theme change carries symbolic weight.
Related tools: if you're rethinking how your team plans sprints, our WSJF calculator, ICE calculator, and RICE calculator help you decide what goes INTO the sprint before you name it.
Join over 5,204 product managers and see how easy it is to build products people love.
Did you know 80% of software features are rarely or never used? That's a lot of wasted effort.
SaaS software companies spend billions on unused features. In 2025, it was $29.5 billion.
We saw this problem and decided to do something about it. Product teams needed a better way to decide what to build.
That's why we created ProductLift - to put all feedback in one place, helping teams easily see what features matter most.
In the last five years, we've helped over 5,204 product teams (like yours) double feature adoption and halve the costs. I'd love for you to give it a try.
Founder & Digital Consultant