Going from feature requests to roadmap is where most product teams struggle. Collecting requests is the easy part. The hard part is turning a pile of raw ideas into a credible roadmap that your team can execute and your customers can trust.
Most teams have a gap between their feedback inbox and their roadmap. Requests accumulate, duplicates multiply, and customers wait months without hearing anything. The result: a feedback board that feels like a graveyard and a roadmap disconnected from what users actually want.
This guide covers the full journey from raw feature request to shipped feature. It includes when to promote requests, how to merge duplicates, how to keep voters in the loop, and how to maintain roadmap credibility over time.
Not every feature request deserves a spot on your roadmap. The roadmap is a commitment signal. When something appears there, customers expect it to happen. Promote requests thoughtfully using these criteria.
Set a minimum vote count before a request qualifies for roadmap consideration. This doesn't mean you automatically promote anything that hits the threshold, but it does mean you review it.
The right threshold depends on your user base:
| User Base Size | Suggested Review Threshold |
|---|---|
| Under 500 users | 5-10 votes |
| 500-5,000 users | 15-25 votes |
| 5,000-50,000 users | 50-100 votes |
| 50,000+ users | 100-250 votes |
These are starting points. Adjust based on how active your feedback board is and how many votes your top requests typically get.
Votes tell you what's popular. Revenue data tells you what's valuable. A feature request with 8 votes from customers representing $40K in MRR can matter more than one with 80 votes from free-tier users.
If you connect your feedback tool to your billing system (ProductLift integrates with Stripe for this), you can see the weighted revenue behind every request. This doesn't replace vote counts. It adds a financial dimension.
Look for requests where:
Even a highly-voted, revenue-backed request may not belong on your roadmap if it doesn't align with your product strategy. Before promoting, ask:
The best roadmap items score well on all three: demand (votes), value (revenue), and strategy (alignment).
Duplicate requests are inevitable. Customers describe the same need in different ways:
These are all the same request, but if you treat them as four separate items, you fragment votes and lose signal.
In ProductLift, you can merge posts directly. Votes and comments are combined automatically, and voters on the duplicate are redirected to the primary request.
Not every similar-sounding request is a true duplicate. "Add Slack notifications" and "Add Slack two-way sync" sound related but are very different features with different effort levels. Only merge when the core ask is the same, even if the wording differs.
This is where most teams fail. They collect feedback, make decisions internally, and never tell the people who submitted and voted on requests what happened.
Closing the feedback loop is one of the highest-impact things you can do for customer engagement. When voters hear "the feature you requested is now planned," they feel heard. When they hear "it just shipped," they feel valued. Both increase retention and trust.
| Status Change | When to Notify | What to Say |
|---|---|---|
| Under Review | When you start evaluating the request | "We're looking into this and will update you on our decision." |
| Planned | When it's committed to the roadmap | "Good news. This is now on our roadmap for [timeframe]." |
| In Progress | When development starts | "We've started building this. Stay tuned for updates." |
| Shipped | When it's live | "This feature is now live! Here's how to use it: [link]" |
| Declined | When you decide not to build it | "After evaluation, we've decided not to pursue this. Here's why: [reason]" |
Manually emailing every voter every time a status changes doesn't scale. Use a tool that sends automatic notifications when statuses update.
ProductLift's Journey Model handles this automatically. When a post moves from one stage to the next (from Feedback to Roadmap to Changelog) every voter and commenter is notified. Your team just changes the status; the system handles the communication.
Here's what a healthy feature request lifecycle looks like from start to finish:
A customer submits a feature request on your feedback board. Other users find it, vote on it, and add comments. Your team reviews it periodically.
Key actions: Acknowledge the submission. Merge duplicates as they appear.
The request hits your review threshold (vote count, revenue signal, or strategic relevance). Your product team evaluates it using a prioritization framework. Options include RICE, ICE, MoSCoW, or Impact-Effort. Choose a feature request tool that supports these frameworks natively so scoring happens alongside your feedback data.
Key actions: Score the request. Compare it against other candidates. Decide: promote, defer, or decline.
The request moves to your roadmap. It has a tentative timeline (quarter, not specific date) and is visible to customers.
Key actions: Notify voters. Update the public roadmap. Brief your engineering team.
Development starts. The request moves from "Planned" to "In Progress" on your roadmap.
Key actions: Notify voters. Keep the roadmap status current.
The feature goes live. The request moves from the roadmap to your changelog.
Key actions: Notify voters with a link to the changelog entry. Share the release with your wider audience. Mark the feedback item as "Completed."
After shipping, monitor adoption. Are the people who requested it actually using it? Is the implementation what they expected?
Key actions: Reach out to top voters for feedback on the shipped feature. Use their input to iterate.
Some feature requests are actually clusters of related needs. "We need better reporting" could mean:
Turning a broad request into multiple scoped features is important for two reasons:
When breaking up a request:
Your changelog doesn't need to mirror your roadmap one-to-one. Sometimes, multiple related features ship in the same release and are better communicated as a single update.
Example: You shipped CSV export, a new filter panel, and a date range picker over three sprints. Instead of three separate changelog entries, write one:
Reporting Overhaul: Export, Filter, and Date Ranges
We've made major improvements to reporting based on your feedback. You can now export any view to CSV, filter data by custom criteria, and select specific date ranges for all reports. Thanks to everyone who voted for these improvements.
This approach is cleaner for customers and demonstrates that you're making substantial progress, not just shipping tiny tweaks.
ProductLift's changelog feature lets you link multiple completed feedback items to a single changelog entry. Voters on all related requests get notified when the combined update ships.
A roadmap loses value the moment customers stop trusting it. Here's how to keep it credible.
Only put items on the roadmap that you're genuinely committed to building. "Maybe" items belong in a backlog, not on a public roadmap. If customers see items sit on "Planned" for a year without movement, they stop believing the roadmap means anything.
Use quarters, not dates. "Q2 2026" is a commitment you can manage. "March 15" is a deadline you'll probably miss, and every missed deadline erodes trust.
A roadmap with 20 items stuck on "In Progress" for six months tells customers you're overwhelmed or disorganized. Move things to "Shipped" when they're done, and be honest about items that slipped.
If a planned item gets deprioritized, say so. "We've moved [feature] to a future cycle because [reason]" is far better than silently removing it. Customers who were tracking it will notice.
A roadmap with 50 items isn't a roadmap. It's a wish list. Show 10-15 items across "Planned," "In Progress," and "Recently Shipped." This gives customers enough visibility without overwhelming them or overcommitting your team.
Include a "Shipped" or "Recently Completed" section on your roadmap. This does two things: it demonstrates that your roadmap is alive and moving, and it gives customers confidence that what's "Planned" today will eventually be "Shipped."
When you do this well, a flywheel starts spinning:
This cycle turns your feedback process into a retention engine and a marketing asset. Customers become advocates when they can point to features they influenced.
Promote when a request meets three criteria: strong demand (votes or revenue signal), strategic alignment with your product direction, and feasible effort relative to the impact. Set a vote threshold as a starting point, but always evaluate revenue and strategy too.
Use automatic status notifications. In ProductLift, changing a post's status from "In Progress" to "Shipped" triggers an email to every voter and commenter. Link to the changelog entry so voters can see exactly what shipped.
Merge duplicates into a single canonical request. Pick the version with the clearest title, combine all votes and relevant comments, and redirect the duplicates. This consolidates demand into one visible number instead of splitting it across multiple entries.
A public roadmap builds trust and reduces "what are you building?" support tickets. It gives customers context for your decisions. Keep it honest by only showing items you're committed to, and use quarters instead of specific dates for timelines.
Break it into individual scoped items. Create separate roadmap entries for each piece, link them to the original request, and ship incrementally. This lets you prioritize parts independently and deliver value faster.
Communicate the change proactively. Update the status, explain the reason for the delay, and give a revised timeline. Silently removing or ignoring delayed items destroys credibility faster than an honest update.
The journey from feature request to shipped feature is where most product teams drop the ball. They're good at collecting feedback and good at shipping code. But the middle (evaluation, prioritization, communication, and follow-through) gets neglected.
The teams that do this well share three habits:
ProductLift automates this entire journey. Feature requests travel through stages (from Feedback to Roadmap to Changelog) with automatic notifications at each step. Your team focuses on building the right things while your customers always know where their ideas stand.
Join over 3,051 product managers and see how easy it is to build products people love.
Did you know 80% of software features are rarely or never used? That's a lot of wasted effort.
SaaS software companies spend billions on unused features. In 2025, it was $29.5 billion.
We saw this problem and decided to do something about it. Product teams needed a better way to decide what to build.
That's why we created ProductLift - to put all feedback in one place, helping teams easily see what features matter most.
In the last five years, we've helped over 3,051 product teams (like yours) double feature adoption and halve the costs. I'd love for you to give it a try.
Founder & Digital Consultant
Learn how to prioritize feature requests using RICE, ICE, MoSCoW, and Impact-Effort. Combine scoring models with revenue data to build what matters.
See how real product teams use RICE, ICE, MoSCoW, and other prioritization frameworks. 6 practical examples with actual scores, decisions, and outcomes.
A practical decision guide for choosing the right product prioritization framework. Answer 4 questions to find the best framework for your team size, data, and decision type.
Side-by-side comparison of 10 product prioritization frameworks. Compare RICE, ICE, MoSCoW, Kano, and others on scoring type, complexity, data needs, and best use cases.
The best prioritization frameworks for startups at every stage. From pre-PMF to growth, learn which framework fits your team size, data, and speed requirements.